Strip silence with Studio Sound or Shorten Word Gaps
Bryan Schiele
If there's laughter or unknown words after transcription, the Shorten Word Gaps feature wants to remove those sections, leaving a choppy edit if you wanted to select "Apply to all". For example, in this screenshot, the name "I-17" (a road here in Arizona) isn't recognized and would be cut if I used the "Apply to All" option.
Gabe Michalski
Merged in a post:
Exclude laughter from Studio Sound, Shorten Gaps, etc.
K
Khaki
Spontaneously recorded shows often include laughter, which which sounds creepy and unnatural after Studio Sound, and which edits poorly with Shorten Gaps.
Gabe Michalski
Merged in a post:
Can studio sound stop gating laughter?
J
Jeremiah Isley
I work on several podcasts, and my participants don't have great microphones so I lean pretty heavily on Studio Sound to clean up the audio.
But Studio sound will somehow leave in tongue clicks, or lip smacks, (which I have to edit out) but then eliminate laughter. Why? I want to hear them laughing at each other's jokes, etc. Can we please train it to leave the laughs in? Thanks!
Autopilot
Merged in a post:
Studio sound is a little over zealous at times
J
John Kirkman
it makes the sound great, but removes bits of my laughter of loud comments. the times i'm having fun with a guest for example.
Gabe Michalski
Merged in a post:
Studio Sound - 's' sounds and laughing
C
Christopher Cheong
Hi! I absolutely love the Studio Sound feature and it has really elevated my podcasts. But the feature does remove the 's' sound kind of often, and also, the laughing sound can sometimes be filtered quite strangely. Would love that to be a bit more refined!
M
Matt Payne
Another vote to fix this. I can't believe this was requested in 2020. It must have something to do with how it's coded.
T
Thomas Craig
I've been asking for this for 2 years now. The fact that Descript treats "unknown" as silence is bonkers. It should be based off the audio input signal. Silence has nothing to do with transcription.
Weldon Johnson
Want to be the first person to post about this in 2025. Still can't believe they don't have this. It would save me so much time and everyone else. Hours a month. I shouldn't have to pay extra for this (audacity does it for free) but I would.
S
Support Team
Merged in a post:
Strip Silence in Sequence Editor
J
Jonathan Bumhoffer
In sequences with with multiple speakers and tracks, I would love a strip silence feature - protools has this feature - analyze the tracks and completely mute the track when no adequate signal is happening (like the person isn't talking), like in a podcast when the other speaker is talking it would completely mute the audio of the person who is not talking.
Even when no audible audio signal is coming through there is still a noise floor - audio level created by the components and also ac/heat and room noise, breathing, mouse clicks, etc..
This would reduce the step of dumping all of the tracks into a DAW just to strip the silence and then have to export them out and dump them into descript.
S
Support Team
Merged in a post:
Studio Sound "Upgrade" is terrible
J
John
The new studio sound upgrade from last month is so much WORSE than the original feature used to be. With the original version, I could literally just record voiceovers in my office, click the button, and they were broadcast ready. In your effort to increase the sensitivity, so that laughter in podcasts would come through (which is I think the new ability you touted) the studio sound effect now lets all sorts of breath and mouth noises and other artifact through. Yes, it does still take away that empty-room echo and make it sound like it's in a studio, but the resulting audio track is still unusable garbage. I have to export it into audacity and run it through a series of noise gates, and de-esser's, and de-clickers, and spend hours removing noises by hand just to make it usable. Even then, it doesn't sound half as good as your original amazing studio sound filter did with one click. I understand that I am using descript more for narration and less for podcasts, so I am probably more sensitive to the change. Perhaps you could put the old studio sound back as a second option, for instance have one studio sound intended for podcasts, that allows that breathing and laughter to come through during the conversation, and then the original studio sound for us narrators, who are sitting right up on top of the mic, trying to get a good, rich, clean, breathless tone, free from gasping or spit in our mouth.
S
Support Team
Merged in a post:
Choppy Studio Sound
P
Philip Andrew Lentz
Future Improvement?
Load More
→