Feature Requests

Had Mac and it broke replaced it with iPad m3. I can’t use iPad for uploads transcribe. If I can’t use descript on my iPad device - will cancel my subscription a will you create this feature in next month?

An Audacity-like silence truncate that doesn't utilize the transcript and instead areas of the waveforms below a certain decibel. Word gaps is just not usable due to words or sounds the transcript misses.

adding a minimum indentation parameter when exporting. that is, so that the subtitles are interrupted only between paragraphs, but between phrases, some phrase is constantly on the screen, namely the previous phrase until the beginning of the next one

Edit the uploaded talking-head video as a professional, high-retention YouTube technology and online-earning video. IMPORTANT: Do NOT simply change the background and do NOT generate a completely new video. Use the uploaded video as the original footage and edit it intelligently according to the exact words being spoken. Analyze the speech sentence-by-sentence and synchronize every visual edit with the spoken words. Create a fast-paced professional editing style with frequent visual changes, similar to premium modern YouTube technology/AI videos, but make the editing completely original. FOR EVERY SPOKEN SENTENCE: Identify the important keyword or concept being spoken. Add a relevant visual, B-roll, graphic, icon, app interface, logo-style visual, animation or cinematic insert exactly when that keyword is spoken. Remove or reduce the visual when the sentence changes. Never show random B-roll that does not match the narration. FOR THIS SPECIFIC VIDEO: When the presenter says: “Agar aapke paas internet hai” → Quickly introduce a modern internet/network visual beside or over the presenter. When he says: “2026 mein online earning start” → Show a strong animated “2026” graphic followed immediately by an online-earning/freelancing visual. When he says: “ye video aapke liye hai” → Quickly punch-in/zoom toward the presenter’s face and make the moment visually engaging. When he says: “ek mistake bilkul mat karna” → Immediately cut/punch-in with a dramatic warning visual, red alert effect, slight screen shake and impact sound. When he says: “sirf ChatGPT use karna seekh lena” → Show a recognizable AI chatbot/ChatGPT-style visual or interface as a quick insert. Keep it on screen only briefly and synchronize it precisely with the word “ChatGPT.” When he says: “online earning ki guarantee nahi hai” → Transition from the AI visual into a clear visual representation of “no guarantee”, such as a crossed-out guarantee concept or income-warning graphic. When he says: “5 practical ways” → Display a strong animated sequence: 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 with quick transitions and impact sounds. When he says: “AI” → Show an AI-related visual. When he says: “real digital skills” → Rapidly show relevant digital skills such as video editing, graphic design, writing, coding or other professional digital work. When he says: “freelancing” → Show a freelancer/client/project visual or a realistic freelance-work interface. When he says: “online work” → Transition into a professional laptop/work-from-home visual. When he says: “Number 5” → Make this the strongest visual moment of the entire hook. Use a large cinematic NUMBER 5 animation, fast zoom, impact transition and energetic sound effect. When he says: “content creators” → Immediately show a content creator setup: camera, microphone, laptop, editing timeline and video-production visuals. When he says: “especially interesting” → Use a quick punch-in on the presenter and a highlighted visual emphasizing curiosity. When he says: “video skip mat karna” → Strong final punch-in/zoom toward the presenter with an attention-grabbing visual and quick transition into the first method. EDITING LANGUAGE: Use: Punch-in zooms Face close-ups Fast camera crops Background blur Motion graphics Kinetic typography B-roll overlays App/interface visuals App/logo-style visual inserts where appropriate Animated icons Screen transitions Quick flashes Subtle screen shake Speed ramps Whip transitions Parallax movement Light/glow effects Impact transitions Match cuts Beat-synchronized cuts Professional sound effects TEXT RULE: Do not put large paragraphs on screen. Only highlight important words such as: “2026” “ONLINE EARNING” “MISTAKE” “ChatGPT” “NO GUARANTEE” “5 PRACTICAL WAYS” “AI” “DIGITAL SKILLS” “FREELANCING” “NUMBER 5” “CONTENT CREATORS” Text should appear exactly when the word is spoken and disappear naturally when the point is finished. VISUAL TIMING: Do not keep one visual on screen for too long. Use fast visual changes approximately every 1–3 seconds when appropriate, but allow important visuals to remain slightly longer when the narration requires it. The presenter should remain the main character. Preserve his face, identity, clothing, natural expressions and lip-sync. Do not distort his face or hands. Use B-roll and graphics around the presenter rather than constantly replacing him. The final result should feel like a professionally edited human-made YouTube video, not an AI slideshow. The editing must visually explain the narration rather than simply decorate it. MOST IMPORTANT: Listen to the exact narration and make editing decisions based on the meaning of each sentence. Every app visual, logo-style visual, B-roll shot, zoom, blur, text animation and transition must appear at the exact moment where it makes sense with the spoken words. Do NOT copy any specific creator's video. Use only the general language of modern high-retention YouTube technology editing and create an original edit.

Copy "similar scenes" like on riverside OR save created scenes to an easily accessible palce in the project with ability to assign them to keyboard shortcuts. This would avoid scrolling back and forth (or switching to storyboard) to copy scenes. I find that copying layouts from my custom layout packs do not work like they used to roughly a year ago. the formatting is often messed up.

In my opinion, the AI credit system is unnecessarily complicated and convoluted; it lacks transparency and clarity. It's hard to know in advance how many credits will be needed to perform various operations and what extra charges (to buy credits) might be needed. This is especially true when deciding whether to use transcription cleanup, filler-word removal, voice correction, dubbing, clip generation, or other automated tools. Consider that: Different AI tools consume credits at different rates. Usage depends on the length of an episode or transcript. Some features may use credits per generation, minute, or request. It is unclear whether failed or repeated attempts consume credits. The interface does not clearly show the estimated cost before an operation. Plan limits and rollover rules are not presented prominently enough. A much better system would show, before each operation, for example: Estimated usage: 18 AI credits Available balance: 240 credits Remaining after operation: 222 credits

I’ve found that professional seo services uk ( https://pearllemonseo.co.uk/services/ ) can be useful when the goal is to make good content easier to discover without changing what the content is actually about. The bigger difference usually comes from understanding the audience, keeping pages clear, and making sure useful information is easy to find. That seems especially relevant for creators who are already putting time into producing videos and written material. What I like about communities such as this feature board is that the feedback often focuses on practical workflow problems rather than abstract ideas. Small improvements to search, publishing, transcription, and content management can save a surprising amount of time when you are working on projects regularly. Even minor friction tends to become noticeable when the same task is repeated dozens of times. For anyone building a content-focused website alongside video or podcast work, I think it makes sense to keep the technical side simple and focus first on usefulness. Clear titles, accurate descriptions, sensible structure, and genuinely helpful content go a long way. Tools are helpful, but they work best when they support a process that already makes sense rather than trying to replace it.

Creating content today involves much more than recording and editing a video. SaaS SEO marketing services https://pearllemonseo.co.uk/industries/saas/ can also become part of the wider discussion when teams think about how their content performs after production. A good workflow should make it easier to move from an idea to something people can actually find and use. That means editing tools need to support more than just the creative side. Descript’s feedback board shows how users often focus on practical improvements to everyday workflows. Requests range from recording and transcription to editing, media management, AI, and publishing. These details can make a noticeable difference when producing content regularly. For example, better search can help users locate older projects without wasting time. Improved transcription can also make editing conversations and presentations much easier. Small interface improvements can matter just as much as larger features. When a tool removes unnecessary steps, creators can spend more time thinking about the actual message. The same idea applies to content that eventually reaches a website or online audience. A well-produced video may provide useful material for articles, guides, and other forms of content. Keeping that process organized helps reduce repeated work. It also makes it easier for teams to maintain consistency across different channels. Feedback platforms are useful because they show what users actually struggle with in their workflows. Instead of assuming what creators need, product teams can look at recurring requests and patterns. Some requests may be simple quality-of-life changes, while others can influence an entire production process. This kind of ongoing feedback can gradually shape a more flexible editing environment. Ultimately, useful software is often defined by how well it handles real-world tasks. The best improvements are not always the most complicated ones. Sometimes a small change can remove a frustrating step that users repeat hundreds of times. That is why continuing to listen to creators remains an important part of building better content tools.

When people share ideas about law firm search engine optimisation https://pearllemonseo.co.uk/industries/law-firms/ on a feedback-focused platform, the discussion can often reveal broader lessons about how users discover and evaluate online content. Clear organization makes those conversations easier to follow and understand. A good feedback board gives users a simple place to describe what is working and what is not. The Descript community reflects this through requests covering editing, transcription, AI, exporting, and collaboration. Many suggestions focus on practical problems rather than broad opinions. For example, users often explain exactly where a workflow becomes slower or confusing. That kind of detail makes feedback much more useful for product teams. It also helps other users recognize whether someone else has experienced the same issue. Search and organization are especially important when a platform contains a large number of discussions. As the number of requests grows, finding relevant conversations can become difficult without useful categories and filtering. Clear titles can also make a major difference when people are trying to locate an existing request. Another valuable part of community feedback is explaining the real situation behind a requested change. A simple feature request may seem minor until the surrounding workflow is explained. Context helps show why a particular adjustment could matter to different types of users. It also reduces repetitive submissions because people can build on existing discussions. Well-structured feedback creates a useful record of recurring problems and possible improvements. Over time, these conversations can become more than individual requests. They can provide a clearer picture of how people actually use a product in their everyday projects. That makes thoughtful, specific feedback valuable for both users and the team working on the platform. The strongest discussions usually stay focused on the actual experience rather than turning into promotional messages. Keeping that balance makes a feedback community more practical and easier for everyone to participate in.

FROM UNDERLORD: When you describe the bug, you can include these key details I've confirmed: New empty scenes created in the composition are automatically rendering an image ("Carolina Closeup Artwork_New.png") from a saved layout in a custom layout pack ("Sandy's Assets") No layout is applied to the scene — the scene data shows zero layers and no layout assignment The image is not in the project's media library The layout pack was created today and contains one layout ("Intro Bumper Template 15s") with that image baked in as a "Keep as is" layer The layout has not been manually applied to any scene in this composition You're right that this seems like a real bug, and the project backup file will help them track it down quickly.