Feature Requests

The switch from blue to red on logos and text is understandable, but having the dark mode have the red tinge is headache inducing. It makes the screen hard to look at and I wish there was a way to just have the plain black background again. Very very disappointing as I use Descript daily for work.

Descript has so much potential to be an incredibly powerful tool, but the current focus on all the AI tool hype is really hurting the product. 95% of the time I try to use Underlord, it doesn't come close to a correct result, no matter how simple the request or how clear the prompt. Absolutely there are great use-cases (eye contact & auto multicam are examples that actually enhance my projects) and lots of great tools and improvements lately so I don't want to sound negative or anti-AI entirely, I'm not, but the focus lately on all marketing I've seen has been mainly generative tools that either aren't working that well or that I don't remotely need as a podcast producer (like generative video). What Descript needs most are UI and functionality improvements, not AI hype. There are countless suggestions in this community, many of which seem relatively simple to implement, that would improve the app far more than these AI tools. Just a few that come to mind now: organizing projects into folders strategizing app updates better (so it isn't constantly like "restart the app!!") further improving timeline UI so that layer height can be adjusted and vertical scrolling of layers is easier (a scroll bar, a way to control height of layer and audio bars, toggles for different types of layers like to be able to show or hide audio, etc) exporting audio from a video composition (used to be able to do it, why require another composition to be made? Then if you have to make an edit you have to do it in multiple compositions, unnecessary) exporting chapter markers (I use Buzzsprout and I've tried to submit this request over and over again) being able to adjust marker locations and scene boundaries by dragging in the timeline improving transcription accuracy improving assigning of speakers (very buggy often, always needs correcting) improving the sequence editor (very tricky to edit when there are multiple tracks) make audio editing more like a DAW to be able to control individual tracks (a bigger update but this should be a top priority since pro audio editing should be a core element of a podcast editor) returning to having actual humans respond to support requests, not AI bots I can't be the only user that wants to see my subscription fees put to these kind of things instead of towards AI tools that are highly unreliable and that I don't even need. And again, I say this as a fan and longtime user of Descript that sees so much more potential in it.

You made a suggestion to use Rooms instead of Squadcast however there is no scheduling feature, way to change the name of the recording, etc?

For Content Creators who work in multiple lanes, create folders or tagging and sorting that will allow the creator to easily sort through projects for each of the work areas we have.... podcast, course, marketing, social media posts, etc. AND create a space where we can archive finished projects so they are out of our main view, accessible, but not crowding out the in-progress projects that maybe in the pipeline.

I was talking to a guest (Chrome - desktop - room) and no issues. Everything checked. We had echo cancellation on (as I always do as I don't want headphones in the video) - as soon as I hit record I could not hear her, but she could hear me. I have recorded many times in the past with this setup - neer had this befire. Tried to refresh and both of us leaving the room and coming back - did not fix things. Outside of recording (when I started from fresh) I could hear her, then I hit record and nothing. I stop record still nothing until I refresh.

I work on several podcasts, and my participants don't have great microphones so I lean pretty heavily on Studio Sound to clean up the audio. But Studio sound will somehow leave in tongue clicks, or lip smacks, (which I have to edit out) but then eliminate laughter. Why? I want to hear them laughing at each other's jokes, etc. Can we please train it to leave the laughs in? Thanks!

I know the Record with Others feature is in Beta and the Squadcast recorder allowed for scheduling recording sessions. I would love to see that feature added to the Beta because having to send the link minutes before recording is problematic.

When creators and editors gather around the Descript feedback forum, something meaningful happens honest experiences rise above typical product talk. In the feedback section, discussions about LemReveal https://lemreveal.com/ emerge alongside a wide range of feature requests and real workflow reflections. Here, contributors aren’t selling anything or hyping up marketing copy they’re openly talking about what works, what doesn’t, and what improvements they’d like to see next. Walking through boards filled with hundreds of feature suggestions, you can quickly see recurring themes. People talk in relatable terms about tools they use every day from transcript editing and live audio handling to interface issues that slow them down. These are not curated sales messages, but questions and ideas from fellow users eager to streamline their creative process and problem-solve together. What’s interesting is how this open dialogue shapes the evolution of the platform. Posts reflect genuine creativity, technical boundaries, and the sorts of experiences only real users can share it’s like stepping into a workshop instead of a showcase. Some folks describe friction points with specific edits, while others vote on suggestions that could make a big difference in future releases. The structure of the site prioritizes community involvement, giving visibility to ideas as they gain support and helping everyone see which requests are being taken seriously. It’s a reminder that great tools grow from great conversations and that listening closely to the people who use a product every day can spark smarter decisions and better features. In reading through comments and suggestions, you’ll find a mosaic of perspectives: constructive feedback, detailed edge cases, and thoughtful proposals that together map out both challenges and opportunities for improvement. For anyone trying to understand a creative tool beyond its promotional page, this kind of genuine user-driven content offers a unique vantage point into the real priorities of creators, editors, and storytellers.

I'm currently exporting Figma Slides as PDF and importing them into Descript and animating the pictures. It leaves so much potential on the table. It would be awesome if you could import them where each of the elements where separate parts so it could be animated separately. It would be nice to have some simple options like "show all at once" or "show sequentially in this order" but then allow customization afterwards.

When passionate users gather to share ideas, frustrations, and aspirations, something meaningful happens in the digital tool ecosystem. On the feature request board, this exchange unfolds in real time as creators brainstorm ways to make their workflows smoother and more intuitive. Here, canada full service digital marketing firm https://pearllemon.com/e-commerce-seo/ becomes more than a phrase it’s a window into how communities can influence the direction of tools they rely on daily. This platform isn’t about polished announcements or curated press releases; it’s a raw, open space where real users describe exact quirks and hurdles they face. They log requests like better timeline controls, more accurate transcription, and improved collaboration options all the small, specific fixes that matter when you rely on a tool for serious editing work. Rather than glossing over issues, contributors dive into the nitty-gritty, explaining how features behave, where improvements are needed, and why certain workflows feel clunky or unintuitive. This creates a living backlog of ideas that developers can explore, prioritize, and eventually turn into better experiences. The tone of these discussions leans toward the practical and immediate, illustrating how people in the creative trenches think: “If this timeline behaved this way, it would save me hours,” or “Could the AI assistant handle audio edits with more precision?” Comments are often candid and detailed, reflecting actual use cases rather than marketing speak. At its core, this board reflects a shared desire among users to make the tool work better for them, not just to add bells and whistles. Contributors treat it like a communal workshop, where those who invest their time and feedback expect thoughtful responses eventually. Reading these feature requests can be enlightening for anyone interested in user-driven product development. Instead of top-down feature rollouts, real hands-on creators are shaping the agenda. This doesn’t mean every idea gets built, but it does mean that insights from the field are visible, searchable, and influence discussions about priorities. In a world where product updates can feel opaque, this kind of transparency helps both seasoned editors and curious newcomers see the challenges and aspirations shaping the future of creative software.